The Loneliness Epidemic- Can Isolation explain political discontent?

Share
The Loneliness Epidemic- Can Isolation explain political discontent?
Photo by Takeshi Arai on Pexels

Loneliness- we all experience it. In fact in 2025, almost one quarter of all British adults reported feeling lonely sometimes, often or even always [1]. Governments continue to treat loneliness as a personal health problem- rather than a political one, but is loneliness and isolation the secret factor, beginning to reshape politics itself?

Isolation is on the rise [2]. In an age where people are connected by electronics more than ever before, many societies are experiencing a decline in meaningful in-person social connection, exacerbated by the gradual defunding of community hubs and local programmes. 

At the same time we are experiencing increased political polarisation, radicalisation and a lack of political engagement across Britain. Can this ever divided Britain, be explained by an ever isolated Britain- or is this simply correlation not causation?

Putnam, the sociologist, proposed his theory of social capital in his book “Bowling alone”. [3] Arguing that American society is losing all the in person interaction that enriches the fabrics of their lives- things like community organisations, clubs and groups, referring to examples like church choirs and bowling leagues. [4]He coined these activities “social capital” and argued they are essential for trust building, civil engagement and political participation- all essential to uphold a strong democracy. Yet the decline of social capital, perpetuated by the television and internet, has led to an increasingly distrusting society in the government since the 1960s, which feels not only isolated socially but politically too, unrepresented by the elites in charge. 

This could help to explain the flourishing of populism in America, with Donald Trump winning a second term. People feeling isolated from society often living in extremely rural areas feel incredibly disconnected from the governmental institutions and elites in the major American cities and therefore find Trump, who portrays himself as anti-establishment and a “saviour”, defending them against these corrupt elites, as highly appealing.

Arguably, Bowling alone is incredibly applicable in British society too.  With Britain also seeing a decline in social cohesion and a homogenous society that Putnam described, and so many feeling lonely in their personal lives and disconnected from the bureaucratic systems of governance contained within parliament, other populist alternatives such as Farage’s Reform UK, who claim to put ordinary British citizens first and defend against the establishment are gaining huge traction.

Andy Burnham, our likely future Prime Minister, clearly also believes that isolation is driving political discontent and polarisation, demonstrated with devolution being his first and main core policy he has proposed. Devolution is simply transferring power from a central level to regional and local levels, and he argues at the moment people feel neglected and detached from this “Westminster Bubble” and therefore powerless in decision making, turning people away from traditional establishment parties to more populist alternatives such as Reform and The Greens. Therefore, he proposes shifting decision making power and funding more to local authorities will mean ordinary people feel politically empowered and engaged, as their opinions are being listened to, regardless of your geographical proximity to London, conveyed with his proposal of a No.10 North [5]. This is in a hope to create a less discontented and more unified Britain

However, the threat of loneliness in encouraging political discontent can go further and more dangerous than simply failing to fully uphold democracy and diminishing political participation. Loneliness is one of the leading psychological drivers into radicalisation [6]. and  the majority of people indoctrinated into extremism have very limited in person social intercourse, instead find comfort in online communities, as they provide them with a sense of belonging to something bigger and interaction that they crave yet is absent in their normal lives. [6]. For example, research from Swansea University found the majority of incels suffer from loneliness and other mental health issues such as depression and anxiety,[7] and as a result of their own lack of positive social interaction in real life start to conflate these struggles with misogynistic views of women as deceitful and entitled thanks to the feminist movement, and therefore responsible for their individual social ostracisation. 

Despite this, the relationship between loneliness and political discontent is anything but straight forward. Others propose that other factors like economic hardship, loss of perceived cultural identity and a lack of opportunity for social mobility are larger contributors to the disenfranchisement and accumulating political discontent of the voter base in Britain today, and therefore loneliness only offers a partial explanation. 

Nevertheless, isolation both socially and politically is an undeniable contributor to political discontent regardless of whether there are other contributors. If democracy relies on trust, cooperation and shared identity, then rebuilding community and restoring social capital is essential to achieve a more engaged and politically cohesive Britain again. 

By Sophie Hartley-Wiley

Footnotes:

[1]

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/publicopinionsandsocialtrendsgreatbritain/january2026

[2]

https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/demographic-change-and-healthy-ageing/social-isolation-and-loneliness

[3]

http://bowlingalone.com/

[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowling_Alone

[5]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clywzj2vk3zo

[6]

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01914537251334550

[7]

https://www.swansea.ac.uk/press-office/news-events/news/2023/11/groundbreaking-study-reveals-the-dating-psychology-of-incels.php